<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How do we interpret Scripture?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mattandangelblog.com/2009/09/how-do-we-interpret-scripture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mattandangelblog.com/2009/09/how-do-we-interpret-scripture/</link>
	<description>I&#039;ll stick with you... like white on rice.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 06:17:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martha</title>
		<link>http://mattandangelblog.com/2009/09/how-do-we-interpret-scripture/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattandangelblog.com/?p=13#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I do love reading these.

I come from a little bit different background then you do.  And I really like the diagrams.  First thing I thought though, is that its still a lot more complex then the diagram.  I would think that some of the authors were actually inspired by Jesus himself.  And most of them probably had a lot more thought and insight then what they wrote in the Bible.  Because a lot of things they considered common, they didn&#039;t record and it was just assumed that everybody knew those &quot;things&quot;.  And so we must take even the Bible with a grain of salt, just as we do everything else.
I think the second picture is much more realistic.

I do read the Bible, but not as often as I should, or not as much as my protestant friends.  Maybe its because I don&#039;t read it as much as I should, but I don&#039;t feel that I would flippantly refer to the Bible as God&#039;s Word.  It is the Word of God, I love calling it that, because it has meaning for me.  Just like I love to call Jesus the Sacrificial Lamb, because it is quite meaningful to me.

  Or maybe I don&#039;t like to use those names as often so they don&#039;t become ordinary.  Kinda like the Voldermort vs He Who Must not be named... if that makes any sense.

My favorite part of what you wrote is under point #3.   You just put words to something I&#039;ve been trying to figure out how to say for like 10 years.   

Very well thought out.  
And happy birthday.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do love reading these.</p>
<p>I come from a little bit different background then you do.  And I really like the diagrams.  First thing I thought though, is that its still a lot more complex then the diagram.  I would think that some of the authors were actually inspired by Jesus himself.  And most of them probably had a lot more thought and insight then what they wrote in the Bible.  Because a lot of things they considered common, they didn&#8217;t record and it was just assumed that everybody knew those &#8220;things&#8221;.  And so we must take even the Bible with a grain of salt, just as we do everything else.<br />
I think the second picture is much more realistic.</p>
<p>I do read the Bible, but not as often as I should, or not as much as my protestant friends.  Maybe its because I don&#8217;t read it as much as I should, but I don&#8217;t feel that I would flippantly refer to the Bible as God&#8217;s Word.  It is the Word of God, I love calling it that, because it has meaning for me.  Just like I love to call Jesus the Sacrificial Lamb, because it is quite meaningful to me.</p>
<p>  Or maybe I don&#8217;t like to use those names as often so they don&#8217;t become ordinary.  Kinda like the Voldermort vs He Who Must not be named&#8230; if that makes any sense.</p>
<p>My favorite part of what you wrote is under point #3.   You just put words to something I&#8217;ve been trying to figure out how to say for like 10 years.   </p>
<p>Very well thought out.<br />
And happy birthday.  <img src='http://mattandangelblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://mattandangelblog.com/2009/09/how-do-we-interpret-scripture/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattandangelblog.com/?p=13#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Wow, this is a lot longer than I expected.  Yeah, its good. This is a healthy response to a dangerous overemphasis by evangelicals.  I have a blog post I&#039;ve been working on that&#039;s somewhat similar that I should finish up and post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this is a lot longer than I expected.  Yeah, its good. This is a healthy response to a dangerous overemphasis by evangelicals.  I have a blog post I&#8217;ve been working on that&#8217;s somewhat similar that I should finish up and post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://mattandangelblog.com/2009/09/how-do-we-interpret-scripture/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattandangelblog.com/?p=13#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
